<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Phil Dzikiy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://phildzikiy.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://phildzikiy.com</link>
	<description>...is a writer.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:20:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>An Imagined Conversation Between Mase and Puff Daddy Regarding “Feel So Good”</title>
		<link>http://phildzikiy.com/2012/01/31/an-imagined-conversation-between-mase-and-puff-daddy-regarding-feel-so-good/</link>
		<comments>http://phildzikiy.com/2012/01/31/an-imagined-conversation-between-mase-and-puff-daddy-regarding-feel-so-good/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phildzikiy.com/?p=709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the studio. Puff Daddy: All right, you ready to rip this track? Mase: Um … about that. There’s something I wanted to talk to you about. PD: What’s up? M: It’s about the song. PD: This song? M: Yeah. One line is really bothering me. Not even a line, really. A stanza. It’s in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p><em>In the studio.</em></p>
<p><strong>Puff Daddy:</strong> All right, you ready to rip this track?</p>
<p><strong>Mase:</strong> Um … about that. There’s something I wanted to talk to you about.</p>
<p><strong>PD:</strong> What’s up?</p>
<p><strong>M:</strong> It’s about the song.</p>
<p><strong>PD:</strong> This song?</p>
<p><strong>M:</strong> Yeah. One line is really bothering me. Not even a line, really. A stanza. It’s in the breakdown.</p>
<p><strong>PD:</strong> The bridge?</p>
<p><strong>M:</strong> Yeah.</p>
<p><strong>PD:</strong> You mean my verse?</p>
<p><strong>M:</strong> Yeah.</p>
<p><strong>PD:</strong> My one little, tiny, microscopic part? The only rhymes I’ve got on the whole track? That part?</p>
<p><strong>M:</strong> &#8230;Yes.</p>
<p><em>Silence.</em></p>
<p><strong>M:</strong> Ah, well, forget it.</p>
<p><strong>PD:</strong> Mason. I said you could always come to me with whatever’s on your mind. You know that.</p>
<p><strong>M:</strong> OK, this is my big solo debut single, right?</p>
<p><strong>PD:</strong> Yeah?</p>
<p><strong>M:</strong> Well, we get to that part, and it’s like, “Do Mase got the ladies?”</p>
<p><strong>PD:</strong> Yeah, yeah.</p>
<p><strong>M:</strong> Which is great, don’t get me wrong. And then, it’s “Do Puff drive Mercedes?”</p>
<p><strong>PD:</strong> Yeah, yeah.</p>
<p><strong>M:</strong> Which—hey, I’m fine with that. You do, indeed, drive Mercedes. But then, it’s like, “Take hits from the 80s?” and “But do it sound so crazy?”</p>
<p><strong>PD:</strong> Too many questions?</p>
<p><strong>M:</strong> No, that’s not it.</p>
<p><strong>PD:</strong> Do it not sound so crazy?</p>
<p><strong>M:</strong> Well, that’s debatable, but my issue is that three of those lines are dedicated to yourself, and only one is about yours truly.</p>
<p><strong>PD:</strong> &#8230;I see.</p>
<p><strong>M:</strong> Now, don’t get me wrong, I’m thankful for absolutely all of this, and I definitely want you on the track. But one line to three? At that big moment? I’m thinking maybe we even it up, make it two for two? That’s fair, right?</p>
<p><strong>PD:</strong> What do you suggest?</p>
<p><strong>M:</strong> I don’t know. Maybe something like, “Do Mase got the ladies? Do Puff drive Mercedes? Take hits from the 80s? And do Mase act so crazy?” Something like that, maybe. Back to me at the end.</p>
<p><strong>PD:</strong> Hmm.</p>
<p><strong>M:</strong> Or “Do Mase got the ladies? Do Puff drive Mercedes? Do Mase act so crazy? And do Puff like Scorsese?” Trade off there, back and forth, me, you, me, you.</p>
<p><strong>PD:</strong> Um.</p>
<p><strong>M:</strong> You’re right, “crazy” doesn’t even rhyme in the first place, to be honest. It’s a stretch. How about the last two lines go, “They bunch like the Bradys? And they won’t go to Hades?”</p>
<p><strong>PD:</strong> Mason, you do realize that 13 different people co-wrote this song.</p>
<p><strong>M:</strong> Thirteen?</p>
<p><strong>PD:</strong> Thirteen. And I didn’t even write my verse. I think I wrote a few lines in the second verse, maybe a few of the “bads.”</p>
<p><strong>M:</strong> Oh. Well, as you always say, “Don’t worry if I write rhymes, I write checks.”</p>
<p><strong>PD:</strong> I will put that in a song someday.</p>
<p><strong>M:</strong> And you should. You should.</p>
<p><strong>PD:</strong> Anyway, I’m glad you brought this up. I know you’ve been thinking a lot about this. It’s nice to know you care. But the verse is going to have to stay. It just fits. Trust me on this. Plus, if I make changes now, I’m going to have to hire at least three more songwriters.</p>
<p><strong>M:</strong> Yeah. OK.</p>
<p><strong>PD:</strong> But hey, I’ll tell you what.</p>
<p><strong>M:</strong> What?</p>
<p><strong>PD:</strong> I’ll let you sing on a track.</p>
<p><strong>M:</strong> Really?</p>
<p><strong>PD:</strong> Yeah, I know you always wanted to sing a bit. <a href="http://youtu.be/9PiXbw5pRts">Last song on the album</a>, you can sing your heart out.</p>
</div>
<p><strong>M:</strong> Really?</p>
<p><strong>PD:</strong> Yeah, we&#8217;ll have fun with it. Get 112 to sing backup and everything.</p>
<p><strong>M:</strong> Wow. Thanks, Puff.</p>
<p><strong>PD:</strong> Please, Mason. It’s Sean. You know that. Now what do you say we rip this track?</p>
<p><strong>M:</strong> Sure thing &#8230; Sean.</p>
<p><iframe width="500" height="375" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/UGEGPq7XvqI?fs=1&#038;feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://phildzikiy.com/2012/01/31/an-imagined-conversation-between-mase-and-puff-daddy-regarding-feel-so-good/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Version 2.0</title>
		<link>http://phildzikiy.com/2012/01/28/version-2-0/</link>
		<comments>http://phildzikiy.com/2012/01/28/version-2-0/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 03:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phildzikiy.com/?p=703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s a brand new look for the website. Fresh. Clean. Updated. Finally.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a brand new look for the website. Fresh. Clean. Updated. Finally.</p>
<p><iframe width="500" height="375" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/QWfZ5SZZ4xE?fs=1&#038;feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://phildzikiy.com/2012/01/28/version-2-0/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My Top 10 Albums of 2011</title>
		<link>http://phildzikiy.com/2011/12/20/my-top-10-albums-of-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://phildzikiy.com/2011/12/20/my-top-10-albums-of-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 23:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phildzikiy.com/?p=688</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;ll be a clean, succinct top 10 this year. Just The Ten Of Us. Right, then. 10.The Strokes — Angles I seem to recall a friend of mine saying this album was awful. Maybe it was a disappointment, but awful? No, that didn&#8217;t seem right. Angles is actually pretty good. Maybe we all expect too [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;ll be a clean, succinct top 10 this year. <a href="http://youtu.be/udTBr7HFswY">Just The Ten Of Us</a>. Right, then.</p>
<p><strong>10.The Strokes — <em>Angles</em></strong></p>
<p>I seem to recall a friend of mine saying this album was awful. Maybe it was a disappointment, but awful? No, that didn&#8217;t seem right. <em>Angles</em> is actually pretty good. Maybe we all expect too much of the Strokes, but don&#8217;t forget that <em>First Impressions of Earth</em> was no great shakes. This is better. &#8220;Machu Picchu,&#8221; &#8220;Under Cover of Darkness,&#8221; &#8220;Taken For a Fool,&#8221; &#8220;Gratisfaction&#8221; &#8230; I wouldn&#8217;t kick any of those tunes out of my ears. I&#8217;d say half of this album holds its own against <em>Room on Fire</em>. Maybe that&#8217;s not everything we&#8217;ve ever wanted, but what else can we ask for at this point?</p>
<p><strong>9. Okkervil River — <em>I Am Very Far</em></strong></p>
<p>Speaking of holding a band up against prior expectations, <em>I Am Very Far</em> doesn&#8217;t grab me like, oh, just about every other Okkervil River album. It&#8217;s hard to put a finger on why, exactly. Maybe the emphasis on making the sound bigger doesn&#8217;t give any time for rest — the coherence of the album actually takes away from the smaller, affecting moments found on past works. That&#8217;s just a theory. Maybe the songs just aren&#8217;t <em>quite</em> as good this time around.</p>
<p><strong>8. Wilco — <em>The Whole Love</em></strong></p>
<p>Kind of a provisional ranking here, because I feel I haven&#8217;t spent enough time with <em>The Whole Love</em> yet. But I really like what Wilco has done here — this is more of a push back to the sound and experimentation of the group&#8217;s peak era. &#8220;I Might&#8221; is the band&#8217;s best song in ages.</p>
<p><strong>7. They Might Be Giants — <em>Join Us</em></strong></p>
<p>The Johns haven&#8217;t lost it, have they? I&#8217;m starting to wonder if they&#8217;re just ingeniously designed song-making automatons, never slowing down, never growing old, writing unforgettable melodies all the while. In some cases, the band that created &#8220;Boat of Car&#8221; is getting even weirder &#8230; listen to &#8220;<a href="http://youtu.be/TkIPH1C5Lts">Cloisonné</a>.&#8221; But I suppose one wouldn&#8217;t expect any less from two guys who have continued to push themselves in every and any direction for the better part of three decades.</p>
<p><strong>6. Stephen Malkmus and the Jicks — <em>Mirror Traffic</em></strong></p>
<p>Good to see Malkmus didn&#8217;t follow <em>Real Emotional Trash</em> down the jammy rabbit hole. (Oh, you&#8217;ve never met the jammy rabbit? He loves carrot-based clothing and his guitar solos never end.)  <em>Mirror Traffic</em> is more vintage Malkmus — sly melodies, full of Malkmus lines:<em> &#8220;For history is not a phase/a doughnut glaze/will rot your teeth/and leave you crazed.&#8221; &#8220;I have no idea when we crystallized into talking bookends.&#8221; &#8220;We&#8217;re unevolving, have you heard of us?/Virtual unvirtuous/A game of faro, can&#8217;t you see?/Bastardized biology.&#8221;</em> And so on and so forth. I suppose I should mention something about how Beck produced the album. Well, I don&#8217;t see how it could have hurt.</p>
<p><strong>5. My Morning Jacket — <em>Circuital</em></strong></p>
<p>First off, at the top, I&#8217;m going to have to address this again. I know I&#8217;ve written about it before, and I talk about it too often. I don&#8217;t want to do this, but I read too much stuff this year that forced my hand. So, once more, with feeling: <em>Evil Urges</em> is, at the very least, the band&#8217;s second-best album. And maybe the best. So stop letting &#8220;Highly Suspicious&#8221; mess your entire perception of MMJ&#8217;s strongest overall collection of songs. I will argue this for as long as necessary.</p>
<p>Anyway, where were we? Ah, yes, <em>Circuital</em>. There&#8217;s a lot of groove going on here. &#8220;Holdin&#8217; On to Black Metal&#8221; is one of the coolest things I heard all year. Then you have &#8220;Wonderful (The Way I Feel),&#8221; which is such a quintessential Jim James song — he brings that gorgeous warmth to the slower tracks. I feel like he could write a few classic songs like this every year. It seems effortless. To me, most of <em>Circuital</em> feels like a natural expansion of the MMJ sound, and I wouldn&#8217;t mind if the group pushed it even further next time around.</p>
<p><strong>4. TV on the Radio — <em>Nine Types of Light</em></strong></p>
<p>It seems I always end up thinking the newest TV on the Radio album is the band&#8217;s best. But this time, I mean it. I swear. More of a grower than anything the group has done before, TVOTR brings a confident, assured sound to <em>Nine Types of Light</em>. And I find myself going back to it more than any other TVOTR album in the past. It came on quietly, but it&#8217;s the group&#8217;s strongest set of songs.</p>
<p><strong>3. tUnE-yArDs — <em>w h o k i l l</em></strong></p>
<p>Who <em>is</em> this? That was my first thought when I heard &#8220;<a href="http://youtu.be/YQ1LI-NTa2s">Bizness</a>.&#8221; Man? Woman? Otherworldly being? Merrill Garbus is a woman, but her voice is from another realm. And so is this album. Garbus layers sounds and loops — anything goes, really — and creates something unique. Which, I realize, is similar to what <a href="http://phildzikiy.com/2011/01/17/my-top-20-albums-of-2010/">I wrote about Sufjan Stevens&#8217; masterpiece <em>The Age of Adz</em></a>. But although neither discriminates when it comes to merging noise and melody, Garbus and Stevens go about their work in different ways. Garbus doesn&#8217;t mind jarring and shaking you a bit more — one gets the sense that, often, she&#8217;s going for just that. And her voice is so reckless, it&#8217;s glorious. Take-no-prisoners, pull-no-punches vocals.</p>
<p>The only thing I don&#8217;t like about the album or the artist are the crazy spellings. I suppose you could say its reflective of her sound or ethos or whatever, but c&#8217;mon now.</p>
<p><strong>2. Let&#8217;s Wrestle — <em>Nursing Home</em></strong></p>
<p>There will always be a place in my heart for brilliant British pop-punk/post-punk. And if it comes with some humor, even better. Let&#8217;s Wrestle carry on that tradition proudly.</p>
<p>Many seemed to enjoy the group&#8217;s debut full-length, <em>In the Court of the Wrestling Let&#8217;s</em>. But few people seemed to pay attention to <em>Nursing Home</em>. (It <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_Home_(album)">doesn&#8217;t even have a Wikipedia page</a>, for crying out loud.) Maybe they thought Let&#8217;s Wrestle was an amusing one-trick pony. Maybe it was the too-clever King Crimson reference.</p>
<p>Well, whatever the case, you folks are missing out, because this trio has gotten even better. Wesley Patrick Gonzalez&#8217;s songwriting is stronger, the Steve Albini production is stellar (of course), and Let&#8217;s Wrestle is just as funny as before. But, lest you be concerned that Let&#8217;s is too immature (one song is titled &#8220;Bad Mammaries&#8221;), be assured that the guys are in on the jokes. Gonzalez wrote the second great &#8220;Suburbs&#8221; song in the last two years. But where Win Butler and Arcade Fire looked to the suburbs with bittersweet nostalgia and found those times didn&#8217;t always lead to an ideal future, Let&#8217;s Wrestle is younger. These guys love the suburbs, and they&#8217;ll miss it, and they&#8217;re not afraid to admit it:<em> </em></p>
<p><em>&#8220;In the suburbs,everything will be all right/In the suburbs, friends will come over each night/In the suburbs, I&#8217;ll have dinner with my mother, then play computer games all night/All I&#8217;ll ever worry about is feeling out of sight/&#8217;Cause I feel so safe here.&#8221;</em> But they&#8217;re also worried about when school ends,<em> &#8221; &#8216;Cause that&#8217;s when I&#8217;ll have to move from here.&#8221;</em> It doesn&#8217;t have the scope and vision of the Arcade Fire song, sure, but it&#8217;s just as honest. Maybe even more so.</p>
<p>If nothing else, enjoying <em>Nursing Home</em> lets me know that I&#8217;m not too old yet. Because when you&#8217;re too old, sometimes, it&#8217;s hard to know.</p>
<p><strong>1. Fleet Foxes — <em>Helplessness Blues</em></strong></p>
<p>This is what you want a second album to be. Fleet Foxes&#8217; full-length debut was very good, with some amazing high points. But spots of the album did drag just a bit. Not the case here. The sound is larger and completely assured. Rather than just a talented band carving a niche for itself, on <em>Helplessness Blues</em>, Fleet Foxes sound like a group fully aware of its many powers.</p>
<p>The opener, &#8220;Montezuma,&#8221; grabs you from the outset. Shimmering and wonderous, I believed almost immediately that it was the band&#8217;s best song. But it has major competition on this album alone. &#8220;Battery Kinzie,&#8221; the title track, &#8220;Lorelai,&#8221; &#8220;The Shrine/An Argument&#8221; are all worthy foes.</p>
<p>Fleet Foxes have earned comparisons to Simon and Garfunkel and Crosby, Stills and Nash, among other classic bands. There are times when I sense a bit of slower prog-rock influences creeping into their work, as well. But all of these comparisons — which can be scattershot — only convince me the band has its own sound now. Its own instant-classic sound. Maybe we couldn&#8217;t all hear that before, but it&#8217;s been solidified with <em>Helplessness Blues</em>. And the lyrics are a thing of beauty. From the majestic <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KyP0DACgdgc">title track</a>:</p>
<p><em>&#8220;I was raised up believing I was somehow unique, like a snowflake, distinct among snowflakes, distinct in each way you&#8217;d conceive. And now after some thinking, I&#8217;d say I&#8217;d rather be a functioning cog in some great machinery, serving something beyond me. But I don&#8217;t, I don&#8217;t know what that will be. I&#8217;ll get back to you someday, soon you&#8217;ll see.&#8221;</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://phildzikiy.com/2011/12/20/my-top-10-albums-of-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Podcastin&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://phildzikiy.com/2011/10/31/podcastin/</link>
		<comments>http://phildzikiy.com/2011/10/31/podcastin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 17:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Podcast]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phildzikiy.com/?p=686</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Plenty of flux in my life right now. So much so that I wish I had some kind of capacitor to harness the power of it all. But one thing is new and certain: A podcast I&#8217;m hosting with my good friend Kevin Purdy. It&#8217;s called In Pod Form, and it deals with matters tech-related, entertainment-related, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plenty of flux in my life right now. So much so that I wish I had some kind of capacitor to harness the power of it all.</p>
<p>But one thing is new and certain: A podcast I&#8217;m hosting with my good friend <a href="http://thepurdman.com/">Kevin Purdy</a>. It&#8217;s called <a href="http://inpodform.com/">In Pod Form</a>, and it deals with matters tech-related, entertainment-related, and so forth. That &#8220;so forth&#8221; could include any number of topics and tangents.</p>
<p>Note: We are not yet experts in matters broadcasting or podcasting, so if we&#8217;re a little rough around the edges, well, that&#8217;s part of the appeal, innit? At least we&#8217;re hoping.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s that link again?</p>
<p><a href="http://inpodform.com/">In Pod Form</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://phildzikiy.com/2011/10/31/podcastin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Super Furry Animals record store theory</title>
		<link>http://phildzikiy.com/2011/09/30/the-super-furry-animals-record-store-theory/</link>
		<comments>http://phildzikiy.com/2011/09/30/the-super-furry-animals-record-store-theory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 00:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phildzikiy.com/?p=683</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#8217;ve only got a couple minutes to decide whether or not you want to spend your time in any given record store. What do you do? I maintain that you can usually tell the quality of any music store by its Super Furry Animals section. Checking the SFA stock is my quick, go-to litmus test. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve only got a couple minutes to decide whether or not you want to spend your time in any given record store. What do you do?</p>
<p>I maintain that you can usually tell the quality of any music store by its Super Furry Animals section. Checking the SFA stock is my quick, go-to litmus test. Here&#8217;s why:</p>
<p>1. Super Furry Animals are a great band, and a personal favorite of mine. I wouldn&#8217;t care to base a theory around a band I didn&#8217;t like. Obviously.</p>
<p>2. Super Furry Animals are just obscure enough. They&#8217;re obscure enough that most people haven&#8217;t heard of &#8216;em, but they&#8217;re not so obscure that it would be unfair to expect a store to carry &#8216;em. The group has plenty of albums, all of which are fairly acclaimed.</p>
<p>3. Super Furry Animals are foreign. Welsh, to be exact. If you see foreign copies of the group&#8217;s albums, any of the group&#8217;s albums before they&#8217;re released in the U.S., or a copy of <em>Mwng</em>? That&#8217;s a good sign you&#8217;ll find other albums you&#8217;ve been targeting.</p>
<p>4. Super Furry Animals have rarities. Again, most of these are not so rare that it would be unreasonable to expect a store to stock them, but rare enough — <em>Out Spaced</em> is a B-sides and rarities compilation, <em>Phantom Phorce</em> is a remix album of <em>Phantom Power</em> that I see from time to time and <em>Songbook: The Singles, Vol. 1</em> is a rarely seen greatest hits comp. Any of these sightings is a plus. SFA&#8217;s first EP was called <em>Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyndrobwllantysiliogogogochynygofod (in space). </em>I&#8217;ve never seen it in person. If you find it in a store? Chances are, there&#8217;s plenty of gold in them thar&#8217; shelves.</p>
<p>5. If the store has a SFA section, but they&#8217;re all out of stock, by all means, do not dismiss the place! After all, someone took the time to write (or type) Super Furry Animals on a white plastic divider, which shows they care. Pick your own band as a litmus test and move along. (If you have hours to browse, you didn&#8217;t need to use the SFA test in the first place.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://phildzikiy.com/2011/09/30/the-super-furry-animals-record-store-theory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

